Have you ever had a case where you felt compelled to include strange things like a double that in a sentence Now, to be honest, it's not something i would likely ever use in everyday language but that doesn't necessaril. If so, then what did you do to resolve this
For me, i never knew whether it was accep. This is something that i've recently had someone tell me is not grammatically correct I would like to know if you can use that with a comma after it
I just received a proofread version of an academic manuscript from my copy editor She essentially changed all of the instances in which i had written given that to given. i've tried to read up. In all seriousness, are there any common patterns or strategies people use to avoid having to write a sentence in which that that appears Evidential decision theory recommends ta.
Actually, there's more to this than mentioned in some other answers The word that is a subordinator It is not a relative word like who, where, when, or which Even in integrated relative clauses, they are not always interchangeable
The following sentence was on one of the tests What would you like to do that others have told you is impossible Students have asked why that could not be replaced with what For the past few years, i have been hearing people say "that tracks,"
My search on green's dictionary of slang yielded nothing with this clear meani. Is that'd an appropriate contraction of that and would I say it, but i'm not sure if it's a legitimate contraction in written form. Your new example now contains a main verb (=, that is, equals), so what you have is correct
To use a simpler sentence 1 we need to show that 2 plus 2 equals 4 That is, that 4 is the sum of 2 and 2 Or 2 we need to show that 2 plus 2, that is, the sum of 2 and 2, is [equals] 4
Note the placement of the punctuation and of that is
